haha.. i duno why when some people say they would comment for the last time and they continue with another long long post..
to the girl. you apologised in ur entry that ur words were harsh in the first entry because u think i deserved it. now, why cant my first entry be harsh when i thought u deserved it too? and please.. i have read alot of times that you said i dont care about my friend's (jarrel's) feelings. you dont know me. on what basis can you say i dont care for my friends? when we saw how tired jarrel was, i DID ask if he was ok to continue to game, if you remember. how i treat my friends, you dont know. much less a 7 years friendship. but if jarrel himself insists that i am a bad friend, i can say nth.. bcos he is at the receiving end. i myself know how i treat my friends, i dont need you to judge for me. thanks.
i will answer the 2 qns you asked in ur blog. regarding the first qn, you asked "why did you decide to continue to let other people know about this even after the matter died down ?? to warn people against us or just for the sake of letting people know how "unfair" it was to you ??" what do you mean by continue to let other people know about this? do you mean my boy? if it is, of cos i'll tell him. come on, he's the closest person to me besides my family, of cos i tell him EVERYTHING. what's wrong with that? you mean whoever i tell also must be permitted by others? i dont go around spreading to others about the issue, but only tell it to my boy. what's wrong with it?
for the 2nd qn, you asked "even if jarrel sit opposite her, he also will purposely let her win one lor." yes i must clarify why i said that. it came out of my mouth in the pique of anger. i can swear it was. if you dont believe, then i have nth to explain. because the feeling i got was jarrel was ok to let you win or rather maybe dont want you to lose too much (like when you went to his cousin's house to play. you lost $20+ and he played for you and won $40+ in the end, but gave you back the $20+ so that you dont lose any that day.. he dont need to do that, right? but he still gave you half of his winnings). back to the point, it seemed TO ME that he's fine if you win so i was angry AT THIS POINT and so i said that. they're words of anger. i can swear they were.
another thing. i dont remember whispering to eunice. perhaps i cant recall, but i've racked my mind and i still cant rmb. but when i whispered to my boy, it was AFTER i saw you did that to jarrel. and i can tell you, it wasn't anything about the unfairness issue on the mahjong table.
to jarrel, if you are angry why i comment on this issue again, i can tell you i have no choice. cos your ex commented on my previous entry back first, and i feel i have the right to clarify my thoughts, if not people will start pointing fingers at us when they read her blog.
i can assure i will NOT comment on this again if i dont see anything regarding to this anymore.